Shape equivalence does not imply CE equivalence
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mutual definability does not imply definitional equivalence, a simple example
We give two theories, Th1 and Th2, which are explicitly definable over each other (i.e. the relation symbols of one theory are explicitly definable in the other, and vice versa), but are not definitionally equivalent. The languages of the two theories are disjoint.
متن کاملn-SHAPE EQUIVALENCE AND TRIADS
This paper concerns the shape theory for triads of spaces which was introduced by the author. More precisely, in the first part, the shape dimension for triads of spaces (X; X0,X1) is introduced, and its upper and lower bounds are given in terms of the shape dimensions of X0, X1, X0 ∩ X1 and X. In the second part, a Whitehead type theorem for triads of spaces and a Mayer-Vietoris type theorem c...
متن کاملDoes Ricardian Equivalence hold when expectations are not rational?
This paper considers the Ricardian Equivalence proposition when expectations are not rational and are instead formed using adaptive learning rules. We show that Ricardian Equivalence continues to hold provided suitable additional conditions on learning dynamics are satisfied. However, new cases of failure can also emerge under learning. In particular, for Ricardian Equivalence to obtain, agents...
متن کاملStatements of equivalence can imply differences: Asymmetries in directional comparisons
Directional comparisons are often used to express similarity (e.g., “North Korea is like China”). These statements, however, frame the subject as the less typical figure and the complement as the more typical or prominent ground. Thus, despite expressing similarity, directional comparisons may imply that the ground is more representative. In Study 1, we analyze Twitter to show that directional ...
متن کاملSuperintelligence Does Not Imply Benevolence
Asmachines become capable ofmore autonomous and intelligent behavior, will they also display more morally desirable behavior? Earth’s history tends to suggest that increasing intelligence, knowledge, and rationality will result in more cooperative and benevolent behavior. Animals with sophisticated nervous systems track and punish exploitative behavior, while rewarding cooperation. Humans form ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
سال: 1980
ISSN: 0002-9939
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1980-0574526-1